![]() The ethical limit of taxation, in: Buchanan, J., Liberty, Market and State, Wheatshelf Books, Brighton. Public Economics in Action : The Basic Income/Flat Tax Proposal, Clarendon Press.īuchanan, J., 1986. Étique économique et sociale, La Decouverte, Paris.Īckerman, B.A., 1980, Social Justice in the Liberal State, Yale University Press, New Haven.Ītkinson, A.B., 1995. H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and SubsidiesĪrnsperger, C., Van Parijs, P., 2000. H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs Universal Basic Income and Negative Income Tax: Two Different Ways of Thinking Redistributionīasic Income Negative Income Tax Redistribution Distributive Justiceĭ - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurementĭ - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions University of Parma - Department of Law, Economics and International Finance We show that Negative Income Tax scheme is coherent with the libertarian idea of distributive justice, while Basic Income follows egalitarian thought. The approach integrates positive and normative analysis and explicit attention to ethical issues provides a more complete description of economic aspects. ![]() Its aim is to show that, although the two achieve the same distributive outcome through an appropriate tax-benefit system, they are fundamentally different from economic and ethical points of view. This article examines two redistributive policies: Negative Income Tax and Universal Basic Income.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |